Group receiving research intervention.
1
However, iNOS protein expression was no significantly different between the experiment group and the control group.
2
The expression of VEGF-C mRNA and protein increased markedly in experiment group, but not in controls.
3
Five mice in the experiment group were sacrificed on day 14 and 28 respectively.
4
The control group was fed commercial chow diet and the experiment group was fed the same diet supplemented with 0.
5
More lymphatic vessels with large caliber were seen in experiment group (P = 0.0004).
1
ORG were significantly reduced in test group when compared to control group.
2
The test group received six injections over an 18 month period.
3
CAL significantly improved only in the test group after 3 months.
4
Inter-group comparison revealed a significant reduction in BANA in test group at 1 month.
5
The feature has been in development for six months with a small test group.
1
Therefore, the preoperative regime has now been changed by the study group.
2
Each study group analysed their data according to a standardised analysis plan.
3
IPI and CD34 confirmed independent impact on survival of the study group.
4
Allocation of study group was done by one-time randomization at ward level.
5
One day, Margot tells David she's going to study group after school.
1
Risk: 5 percent of test subjects experience a fatal cardiac volume increase.
2
Usually the test subjects would simply be unable to distinguish similar-looking individuals.
3
He'd go through more test subjects, but it sure would be fun.
4
The test subjects in the containment unit were lost to them now.
5
He was one of the original Rhine test subjects, a high scorer.
1
Results: e experimental group had 32 members, the same as the control.
2
Biomechanical test revealed no significant difference between experimental group and normal group.
3
However, CIT and stimulation index were negatively correlated in each experimental group.
4
Subjects in the experimental group underwent an un-prepped flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsies.
5
In the experimental group none of the animals suffered hyperacute rejection.
1
No local or systemic adverse effects were seen from either treatment group.
2
Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed as mean values for each treatment group.
3
Regression rates were similar by treatment group in patients with low VEGF.
4
This is explained by a higher restenosis rate in this treatment group.
5
Two patients died during the study period, 1 in each treatment group.
1
Further functional studies in this region are planned by this research group.
2
Simon Jacobson, supply-chain analyst at technology research group Gartner, tended to agree.
3
Shortly after the second UFO-radiation episode the research group finished its work.
4
The research group is hoping to find more funding to continue their work.
5
That is the highest level since the research group started measuring in 2004.
1
A median time to recurrence was not reached in either treatment arm.
2
Results: A total of 137 children were enrolled in each treatment arm.
3
Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled with 32 in the treatment arm.
4
Sample: The 32 patients in the IPT treatment arm were analyzed.
5
Design: Nested case-control study of all subjects randomized to the STH treatment arm.
6
Controls were frequency-matched to cases by age, treatment arm, and family history of PCa.
7
Efficacy results within each treatment arm appeared better for patients with a metabolic response.
8
QoL compliance and baseline PF and GHS scores did not differ by treatment arm.
9
SNPs associated with prostate cancer risk differed by treatment arm.
10
Multivariate Cox regression analysis was done to account for established prognostic factors and treatment arm.
11
However, there was toxicity in the combined treatment arm.
12
Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between treatment arm and cardiovascular mortality.
13
Controls were frequency matched to cases by age, treatment arm, and family history of prostate cancer.
14
Approximately one third of the patients in each treatment arm were stable at the nine-week evaluation.
15
This relationship was not influenced by treatment arm.
16
Fifty-one patients were entered into each treatment arm.